1. Restitution – Section 144 CPC
Concept
Based on the maxim: Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit (an act of court shall prejudice no one).
Ensures that a party is restored to the position they would have occupied but for the decree/order which is later varied, reversed, or set aside.
Essential Conditions
A decree/order must have been varied, reversed, or set aside.
The party must have suffered loss due to such decree/order.
Restitution must be consequential and necessary.
Scope
Includes refund of money, mesne profits, interest, costs.
Applies even to execution proceedings.
Nature
Statutory recognition of equitable principle.
Mandatory when conditions are satisfied.
Key Case Laws
Binayak Swain v. Ramesh Chandra Panigrahi
→ Restitution is not discretionary; court must restore parties to original position.South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. State of M.P.
→ Doctrine of restitution applies even in interim orders; unjust enrichment must be prevented.
2. Caveat – Section 148A CPC
Concept
A precautionary measure allowing a person to ensure that no ex parte order is passed against them.
Who May File
Any person claiming a right to appear before the court on hearing of an application.
Procedure
Caveat filed in court.
Notice served on applicant.
Applicant must furnish copies of application/documents.
Court must give notice to caveator before passing any order.
Validity
Caveat remains valid for 90 days from date of filing.
Objective
Prevents abuse of process and ensures audi alteram partem.
Key Case Laws
Nirmal Chand v. Girindra Narayan
→ Right to lodge caveat is preventive and ensures hearing.Kattil Vayalil Parkkum Koiloth v. Mannil Paadikayil Kadeesa Umma
→ Caveat can be filed even before institution of proceedings.
3. Inherent Powers – Section 151 CPC
Concept
Courts possess residual powers to do justice where CPC is silent.
Purpose
To:
Prevent abuse of process of court
Secure ends of justice
Limitations
Cannot be exercised:
Contrary to express provisions of CPC
Where specific remedy exists in CPC
Nature
Discretionary and complementary, not overriding.
Key Case Laws
Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal
→ Inherent powers can be used where CPC does not provide specific remedy.Padam Sen v. State of Uttar Pradesh
→ Cannot be exercised in conflict with express provisions.
4. Related Procedural Powers
Section 148 – Enlargement of Time
Court may extend time even if original period expired.
Limit: 30 days (generally).
Case Law
Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India
→ Time extension is discretionary but must be exercised judiciously.
Section 149 – Court Fees
Court may allow deficiency in court fees to be made good later.
Once paid, it relates back to date of institution.
Case Law
Mannan Lal v. Chhotka Bibi
→ Payment of deficit court fee has retrospective effect.
Section 152 – Amendment of Judgments/Decrees
Court may correct:
Clerical mistakes
Arithmetical errors
Accidental slips or omissions
Case Law
Master Construction Co. v. State of Orissa
→ Only accidental errors can be corrected, not substantive changes.
Quick Revision Table
| Section | Topic | Key Idea |
|---|---|---|
| 144 | Restitution | Restore parties to original position |
| 148A | Caveat | Prevent ex parte orders |
| 151 | Inherent Powers | Ends of justice / prevent abuse |
| 148 | Enlargement of time | Extend procedural timelines |
| 149 | Court fees | Deficiency can be cured |
| 152 | Amendment | Correct clerical errors |
Comments
Post a Comment