Skip to main content

INTERPLEADER (Section 88 & Order XXXV CPC)

 

1. Concept and Meaning of Interpleader

An interpleader suit is a special civil remedy that enables a person, who is in possession of property or money claimed by two or more persons adversely, to seek the court’s determination as to who is the rightful claimant, without exposing himself to multiple liability.

The plaintiff in an interpleader suit is not asserting a right, but is merely seeking judicial protection and indemnity.

2. Statutory Basis

  • Section 88 CPC – Substantive provision

  • Order XXXV Rules 1–6 CPC – Procedural framework

3. Section 88 CPC – Interpleader Suit

Textual Essence

Where:

  1. Two or more persons claim adversely to one another

  2. The same debt, sum of money, or property (movable or immovable)

  3. From a person who:

    • Claims no interest in it (except charges/costs), and

    • Is ready to deliver or pay to the rightful claimant

Such person may institute an interpleader suit against all claimants:

  • To obtain a decision as to entitlement, and

  • To obtain indemnity.

Proviso

No interpleader suit shall lie if a pending suit already exists in which the rights of all parties can be properly adjudicated.

4. Essential Conditions for Interpleader Suit

An interpleader suit is maintainable only if:

  1. Adverse claims exist

  2. Claims relate to identical subject-matter

  3. Plaintiff has no beneficial interest

  4. Plaintiff is ready and willing to part with the property

  5. No collusion between plaintiff and any defendant

  6. No effective pending suit covering the same dispute

5. Order XXXV CPC – Procedural Provisions

Rule 1 – Plaint in Interpleader Suit

The plaint must specifically state:
(a) Plaintiff claims no interest except charges/costs
(b) Separate claims of defendants
(c) Absence of collusion

➡️ These averments are mandatory; omission is fatal.

Rule 2 – Payment or Deposit into Court

If the subject-matter is capable of being:

  • Paid into Court, or

  • Placed in Court custody

The Court may require such deposit as a condition precedent for granting relief.

Rule 3 – Where Defendant is Suing Plaintiff

If:

  • One claimant has already sued the plaintiff regarding the same subject-matter

Then:

  • Proceedings in that suit shall be stayed

  • Plaintiff’s costs may be:

    • Provided for in the stayed suit, or

    • Added to costs in the interpleader suit

➡️ Prevents parallel proceedings and harassment.

Rule 4 – Procedure at First Hearing

(1) Court’s Options

The Court may:
(a) Discharge the plaintiff, award costs, and dismiss him from suit
OR
(b) Retain all parties till final adjudication if justice requires

(2) Summary Adjudication

If admissions or evidence suffice, the Court may directly decide title.

(3) Framing of Issues

If not:

  • Issues may be framed

  • One or more defendants may be converted into plaintiffs

  • Suit proceeds as an ordinary civil suit

Rule 5 – Bar on Agents and Tenants

Agents cannot sue principals, and
Tenants cannot sue landlords by interpleader,

❌ Except where claims are made through the principal or landlord.

Illustrations Explained

  • Illustration (a): Agent cannot compel principal and third party to interplead

  • Illustration (b): Agent may interplead where both claims trace back to the principal

Rule 6 – Charge for Plaintiff’s Costs

Where the suit is properly instituted, the Court may:

  • Grant the plaintiff a charge on the property, or

  • Adopt any other effective method to secure his costs

6. Nature and Object of Interpleader Suit

  • Protective, not adversarial

  • Prevents multiplicity of proceedings

  • Shields an innocent stakeholder

  • Ensures single authoritative adjudication

7. Who Can and Cannot File

Can File

  • Bailee

  • Banker

  • Trustee

  • Stakeholder

  • Auctioneer (subject to facts)

Cannot File

  • Person asserting ownership

  • Agent against principal (general rule)

  • Tenant against landlord (general rule)

  • Person acting collusively

8. Distinction: Interpleader Suit vs Ordinary Suit

BasisInterpleader SuitOrdinary Suit
Plaintiff’s InterestNone (except costs)Claims a right
Cause of ActionAdverse claims of othersPlaintiff’s grievance
ReliefDeclaration + indemnitySubstantive relief
Role of PlaintiffNeutral stakeholderContesting party

9. Practical Examples

  • Bank facing rival claims over a fixed deposit

  • Warehouse keeper facing multiple ownership claims

  • Court-appointed receiver holding disputed property

10. Examination Pointers

  • Section 88 + Order XXXV must be read together

  • Absence of collusion is crucial

  • Interpleader is not maintainable if plaintiff has interest

  • Rule 5 is a statutory bar, not merely discretionary


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contract Notes - 3

Object and Consideration in Contract Act, 1872 Object of a Contract The object of a contract is the purpose or intention behind the agreement between parties. For an agreement to be enforceable as a contract, its object must be lawful and not opposed to public policy or morality. The lawful object is a necessary element of a valid contract. If the object of the contract is illegal or immoral, the agreement is void. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act states that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful unless it is forbidden by law, or is opposed to public policy, or is fraudulent, or involves injury to the person or property of another, or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy. Significance The object ensures that contracts are not made for purposes harmful to society or contrary to law. This protects public interest and maintains ethical standards in contractual relations. Landmark Case: Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1959) AIR 781...

Sales of Goods Act, 1930: Section-Wise Notes

1. Concept of Sale and Agreement to Sell 1.1 Definitions Sale of Goods (Section 4(b)): Sale is a contract whereby the ownership (property) in goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer for a price. Both the transfer of ownership and payment of price distinguish a sale. Agreement to Sell (Section 4(a)): Agreement to sell is a contract where the transfer of ownership is to take place at a future time or subject to certain conditions to be fulfilled later. Ownership passes only when those future conditions or time arrive. 1.2 Difference between Sale and Agreement to Sell Aspect Sale Agreement to Sell Transfer of Ownership Immediate transfer of ownership Transfer is future or conditional Nature of Contract Executed contract Executory contract Risk Passes to buyer immediately Remains with seller until transfer Remedies on Seller’s insolvency Buyer becomes owner; goods not affected Buyer has only contractual claim 1.3 Essential Elements of a Contract of Sale Two ...

Contract Act Notes 1

Importance of Contracts Meaning of Contract A contract, per Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is an agreement enforceable by law. It represents the foundation of business, personal, and legal interactions where parties agree on rights and obligations. Role and Significance of Contracts Legal Enforceability: Contracts give legal backing to promises enabling parties to seek remedies in courts for breach, promoting trust. Facilitates Commerce: Provides a framework for predictable and secure commercial transactions, essential for business growth and economic stability. Defines Rights and Duties: Contracts clarify mutual duties and expectations, reducing disputes. Social Utility: Contracts facilitate cooperation in various spheres including employment, trade, insurance, real estate, etc. Dispute Resolution: Establishes mechanisms for remedies like damages, specific performance, cancellation. Framework for Justice: Ensures fairness, equity, and...