Skip to main content

Article 356 of the Indian Constitution – State Emergency (President’s Rule)

 

1. Overview:

  • Article 356 of the Indian Constitution provides for the imposition of President’s Rule in a state if the Governor reports to the President that the government in the state is not functioning according to the provisions of the Constitution.

  • This is commonly referred to as "State Emergency" or "President’s Rule".

2. Conditions for Imposition:

  • Failure of Constitutional Machinery: The President’s Rule can be imposed if:

    • The state government is unable to function as per the Constitution.

    • There is a breakdown of law and order.

    • The Governor reports that the government is not able to discharge its constitutional responsibilities.

3. Procedure for Proclamation:

  • Governor’s Report: The process starts with the Governor of the state sending a report to the President about the failure of the constitutional machinery.

  • Presidential Proclamation: The President may then issue a proclamation under Article 356, assuming the powers of the state government.

  • Parliamentary Approval: The proclamation must be approved by Parliament within two months.

  • Re-evaluation: Every six months, Parliament must review the situation to decide whether the rule should continue.

4. Duration of President’s Rule:

  • The initial period of President’s Rule is six months.

  • It can be extended for three years with the approval of Parliament if the situation continues to warrant it.

  • However, the extension beyond three years is possible only if a national emergency is in effect.

5. Impact of President’s Rule:

  • Centralization of Power: The President assumes the powers of the state government, including the powers of the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers.

  • Legislative Power: The Parliament can make laws for the state on any subject in the State List.

  • Dissolution of State Assembly: The state legislature may be dissolved or kept in suspended animation.

6. Judicial Review:

  • The Supreme Court has the power to review the validity of the proclamation under Article 356.

  • The court can examine:

    • Whether there was genuine failure of constitutional machinery.

    • Whether the proclamation was based on objective grounds or was used for political purposes.

7. Key Case Laws on Article 356:

a) S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) – Landmark Judgment

  • Facts:

    • The dismissal of the government in several states, including Karnataka, was challenged.

  • Issue:

    • Whether the President’s Rule was valid and whether it could be imposed for political reasons.

  • Judgment:

    • The Supreme Court ruled that President’s Rule cannot be imposed arbitrarily.

    • It emphasized the need for federal principles and that the President’s powers are subject to judicial review.

  • Significance:

    • Restricted the misuse of Article 356 for political gains.

    • Reinforced the principle of federalism in India.

b) State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)

  • Facts:

    • The case dealt with the dismissal of the Rajasthan government and imposition of President’s Rule.

  • Issue:

    • Whether the dismissal was justified under Article 356.

  • Judgment:

    • The Court ruled that the failure of constitutional machinery must be based on objective facts and not on subjective opinions.

  • Significance:

    • Clarified that the President’s powers under Article 356 are not absolute.

8. Abuse and Misuse of Article 356:

  • Article 356 has been misused in the past to dismiss elected state governments for political reasons, especially when the central government wanted to retain control over the states.

  • Examples of misuse:

    • Dismissal of non-Congress governments in several states during the 1980s and 1990s.

9. Key Features:

  • Article 356 is a “weapon of last resort”—it should be used only when the state machinery fails completely.

  • The President’s Rule is not a tool for political interference but for maintaining constitutional governance.

10. Recent Developments:

  • Judicial activism has increased scrutiny of the use of Article 356.

  • The courts have laid down strict guidelines to prevent its misuse.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contract Notes - 3

Object and Consideration in Contract Act, 1872 Object of a Contract The object of a contract is the purpose or intention behind the agreement between parties. For an agreement to be enforceable as a contract, its object must be lawful and not opposed to public policy or morality. The lawful object is a necessary element of a valid contract. If the object of the contract is illegal or immoral, the agreement is void. Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act states that the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful unless it is forbidden by law, or is opposed to public policy, or is fraudulent, or involves injury to the person or property of another, or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy. Significance The object ensures that contracts are not made for purposes harmful to society or contrary to law. This protects public interest and maintains ethical standards in contractual relations. Landmark Case: Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1959) AIR 781...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sales of Goods Act, 1930: Section-Wise Notes

1. Concept of Sale and Agreement to Sell 1.1 Definitions Sale of Goods (Section 4(b)): Sale is a contract whereby the ownership (property) in goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer for a price. Both the transfer of ownership and payment of price distinguish a sale. Agreement to Sell (Section 4(a)): Agreement to sell is a contract where the transfer of ownership is to take place at a future time or subject to certain conditions to be fulfilled later. Ownership passes only when those future conditions or time arrive. 1.2 Difference between Sale and Agreement to Sell Aspect Sale Agreement to Sell Transfer of Ownership Immediate transfer of ownership Transfer is future or conditional Nature of Contract Executed contract Executory contract Risk Passes to buyer immediately Remains with seller until transfer Remedies on Seller’s insolvency Buyer becomes owner; goods not affected Buyer has only contractual claim 1.3 Essential Elements of a Contract of Sale Two ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Contract Act Notes 1

Importance of Contracts Meaning of Contract A contract, per Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is an agreement enforceable by law. It represents the foundation of business, personal, and legal interactions where parties agree on rights and obligations. Role and Significance of Contracts Legal Enforceability: Contracts give legal backing to promises enabling parties to seek remedies in courts for breach, promoting trust. Facilitates Commerce: Provides a framework for predictable and secure commercial transactions, essential for business growth and economic stability. Defines Rights and Duties: Contracts clarify mutual duties and expectations, reducing disputes. Social Utility: Contracts facilitate cooperation in various spheres including employment, trade, insurance, real estate, etc. Dispute Resolution: Establishes mechanisms for remedies like damages, specific performance, cancellation. Framework for Justice: Ensures fairness, equity, and...
Post a Comment
Read more