Skip to main content

Curable Irregularity and widen Scope of S 498A

Today Supreme court finally gave its judgement in one of its much awaited trial. Both of its judgement added a new meaning to the criminal law in India. One of its judgement was on Curable Irregularity while the other one widened the scope of S498A of IPC. The brief explanation of them is given as under:

Examination Of Witnesses In The Absence Of Accused Is A Curable Irregularity[1] [Atma Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan]

Absence of the accused while taking evidence of prosecution witnesses, by itself, would not vitiate the trial, unless great prejudice has caused to the accused, the Supreme Court held, while upholding a High Court judgment which ordered fresh trial in a murder case. The bench comprising of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Indu Malhotra was considering an appeal against High court judgment which ordered fresh trial by directing the trial court to lawfully re-record statements of the witnesses whose evidence was recorded in the first round without ensuring presence of the accused in the court.

Facts of the case:
  •  The evidence of twelve witnesses was recorded in the present matter without the accused being present in Court.
  • The trial court after considering the entirety of the matter imposed death sentence on four accused namely, Atma Ram, Omprakash, Leeladhar and Shrawan Kumar.
  • The Signature Not Verified matter reached the High Court for confirmation of sentence Digitally signed by INDU MARWAH Date: 2019.03.07 17:29:26 IST Reason: and at that stage a plea was raised on behalf of the accused that the evidence of said twelve witnesses having been recorded in the absence of the accused, the principle in Section 273 Cr.P.C. was violated.

 498A Case Can Be Filed At A Place Where A Woman Driven Out Of Matrimonial Home Takes Shelter [Rupali Devi V. State of Uttar Pradesh]

Answering a reference pending for about seven years, the Supreme Court held that the courts at the place where the wife takes shelter after leaving or driven away from the matrimonial home on account of acts of cruelty committed by the husband or his relatives, would, dependent on the factual situation, also have jurisdiction to entertain a complaint alleging commission of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Facts of the case:
  •  The petitioner is the complainant in the aforesaid criminal case. Earlier, respondents no.2 to 6 were summoned to face trial under sections 498-A, 494, 313, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act.
  •  An application was moved on behalf of the accused under section 177 Cr.P.C. challenging the territorial jurisdiction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria, which was rejected.
  • The respondents filed criminal revision, which has been allowed vide judgment and order dated 28.5.2007 passed by the revisional court holding that the cause of action arose in District Mau and the Courts at Deoria had no jurisdiction to try the case.
Today’s SC judgement was important in many ways, though it took considerable time to give its direction but it was worth waiting. Initially there were few complications in Rupali devi’s case yet it managed to deliver a good piece of judgement.

Well today’s blog was precisely based on legal aspect, I hope you gained something worthwhile.
Happy Reading :) 

Author : Shivanshu Katare




[1] Curable irregularity: Section 465 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973  states, the sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission irregularity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Organs of Government: Relationship Between the Executive

  AUTHOR: SHIVANSHU KATARE Introduction to the Organs of Government In a modern democratic state, the government is typically divided into three branches or organs : The Legislature : Responsible for making laws. The Executive : Responsible for implementing laws and managing day-to-day administration. The Judiciary : Interprets laws and ensures justice. Each organ has distinct powers, but they function interdependently. The relationship between the executive and the other organs is crucial for maintaining the proper functioning of the government. Here, the focus is on the relationship between the executive and the legislature , which is often complex and varies across different political systems. 1. The Role and Structure of the Executive The Executive is primarily responsible for the implementation of laws and administration of government policies. It can be divided into two categories: Political Executive : Comprising the Head of State (e.g., the President in India) and the Hea...

Judicial Accountability Bill, 2013

  AUTHOR: SHIVANSHU KATARE The Judicial Accountability Bill, 2013 was introduced in the Indian Parliament to address the issue of judicial accountability in the country. The bill aimed to ensure that judges, especially of higher courts, are held accountable for their conduct and decisions, while simultaneously safeguarding the independence of the judiciary. This bill was a step towards bringing transparency, fairness, and accountability in the judicial system, as it is essential for maintaining public trust in the judicial process. Context and Background The bill was introduced in response to several concerns regarding judicial accountability, the lack of transparency in the appointment and conduct of judges, and the increasing demands for judicial reforms. While the Indian judiciary is an independent body, there has been criticism about its lack of accountability mechanisms, particularly in cases involving judicial misconduct or inefficiency. The Judicial Accountability Bill, 2...

Theories of law and sociology

 Theories of law and sociology provide different lenses to understand the relationship between law, society, and individuals. Law is often seen not just as a set of rules but as a reflection of societal norms, power structures, and historical context. Sociology of law explores how law functions within a society and how it shapes and is shaped by social relationships, structures, and institutions. Below is a detailed examination of key theories within these two fields: 1. Natural Law Theory Natural Law Theory is one of the oldest and most influential theories about law, originating from ancient Greece and Rome. It suggests that law is not just a human invention but is rooted in a higher, universal moral order. Natural law theorists argue that certain principles of justice and morality are inherent in nature, discoverable through human reason, and should be reflected in human-made laws. Key Figures : Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, John Locke. Core Ideas : Laws should be based on moral va...